Retraction, Part 2

I have also retracted my complaint letter to the RIAA. (See the retraction I posted on my blog, at http://the_scrivener.blogspot.com/2007/06/retraction.html.)


The thumbnail of my retraction letter is here. The PDF of the retraction letter is here.

A Retraction

It has come to my attention that noncommercial copying of digital music recordings may not be an infringement under Title 17 of the U.S. Code, "Copyrights." I apologize for any confusion I may have caused or any mistaken impression I may have given.

Copyright is Dead, Part 2

The original contents of this post have been removed, as they may not have contained all pertinent information. That information was not necessarily available to me, or to the public.

It has come to my attention that noncommercial copying of digital music recordings may not be an infringement under Title 17 of the U.S. Code, "Copyrights." I apologize for any confusion I may have caused or any mistaken impression I may have given.

Please see the retraction I have published on my blog, at http://the_scrivener.blogspot.com/2007/06/retraction.html.

Copyright is Dead

The original contents of this post have been removed, as they may not have contained all pertinent information. That information was not necessarily available to me, or to the public.

It has come to my attention that noncommercial copying of digital music recordings may not be an infringement under Title 17 of the U.S. Code, "Copyrights." I apologize for any confusion I may have caused or any mistaken impression I may have given.

Please see the retraction I have published on my blog, at http://the_scrivener.blogspot.com/2007/06/retraction.html.